Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Isenstadt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 1945PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The defendant has been found guilty by a judge of the Superior Court sitting without jury upon two complaints charging him respectively with selling and with having in his possession for the purpose of sale, exhibition, loan, or circulation a book published under the title “Strange Fruit,” which is “obscene, indecent or impure, or manifestly tends to corrupt the morals of youth.” G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 272, § 28, as amended by St. 1934, c. 231, and St. 1943, c. 239. The section (except the part describing the penalty) is reproduced in the footnote.1

The complaints are in disjunctive form, but…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Mitchell Brothers Film Group and Jartech, Inc. v. Cinema Adult Theater, A/K/A Cinema 69Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API