Legal Opinion

In Re Frank Kent Motor Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided February 24, 2011No. 02-10-00462-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL MEIER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Relator Frank Kent Motor Company d/b/a Frank Kent Cadillac seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s November 30, 2010 order denying its motion to strike Real Party in Interest Tony Garcia’s jury demand. We will conditionally grant Frank Kent’s petition for writ of mandamus.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Garcia sued Frank Kent for age discrimination and demanded a jury trial in his original petition. Frank Kent thereafter filed a motion to strike Garcia’s jury demand, arguing that Garcia waived his right to a jury trial. Frank Kent attached…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Flameout Design & Fabrication, Inc. v. Pennzoil Caspian Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Frank Kent Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Lost Maples General Store, LLC and William Butler v. Ascentium Capital, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API