Legal Opinion

Ullrich v. Bigger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1910No. 16,334PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The facts of this controversy are stated in Caldwell v. Bigger, 76 Kan. 49. After the adjudication in that action became final Ullrich sued Bigger and Bigger’s grantees for the land involved, claiming that Martin took title under the sheriff’s deed in trust for Ullrich. The defendants pleaded the proceedings in the former action, and at the trial the cause was rested upon such proceedings, including the evidence taken which had been duly preserved in the record made for this court. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and Ullrich appeals.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Sweet v. Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Kelso v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Burrows v. JohntzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Moline Plow Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ireland v. WaymireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Smith v. RussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. James v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Storm v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Allen v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API