Legal Opinion
Harlan v. Pratt
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1875No. 4705PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. No transcript had been filed in the Supreme Court at the time the motion was made and decided. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
The notice of appeal was filed on March 21,1874, but was not served until the 23d of that month. Under the statute, *95as it stood at those periods, these steps did not operate an appeal. (Columbet v. Pacheco, 46 Cal. 650.) Upon the face of the record, no appeal appearing to have been taken, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be denied.
So ordered.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Columbet v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by1 opinion
- Territory v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1888