Kauffman v. Schauer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEobinson, J.
This case presents the troublesome question of the discretion of the court in ruling upon a motion for a directed verdict.
Unquestionably, where the evidence responds to the issues made by the pleadings, and no showing is made or developed by the trial for not indulging the presumption, that is otherwise indulged, that the parties have presented by the evidence introduced all the facts pertinent to the controversy, it is the absolute duty of a court, upon determining that there is no evidence tending to prove plaintiff’s cause of action, or no evidence tending to prove defendant’s affirmative…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RudgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Donofrio v. Amerisure InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gates v. DillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
- State v. CraigOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. NixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.