Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of Somerset v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 21, 2005No. 2003-CA-001522-MR, 2003-CA-001523-MRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBuckingham, Judge

I concur with most portions of the majority opinion. However, I respectfully dissent from the portion of the opinion allowing the taxpayers to seek refunds as a part of their class action suit.

The circuit court certified this case as a class action and determined that the City had not been authorized to collect ad valo-rem taxes on the taxpayers’ real property. But the circuit court did not allow the taxpayers to seek refunds as a class. Citing the Taulbee and Swiss Oil eases, the court concluded that class action relief was not available for the refund of taxes.26

As noted by the majority,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lipsett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. Sowders v. AtkinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  5. McConnell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API