City of Somerset v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBuckingham, Judge
I concur with most portions of the majority opinion. However, I respectfully dissent from the portion of the opinion allowing the taxpayers to seek refunds as a part of their class action suit.
The circuit court certified this case as a class action and determined that the City had not been authorized to collect ad valo-rem taxes on the taxpayers’ real property. But the circuit court did not allow the taxpayers to seek refunds as a class. Citing the Taulbee and Swiss Oil eases, the court concluded that class action relief was not available for the refund of taxes.26
As noted by the majority,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Lipsett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Sowders v. AtkinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- McConnell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.