Legal Opinion

In re Rabell

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 24, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appellants, two of the next of kin of the ■decedent, were, without opposition and at least by parity of right, appointed administratrices of the estate. Hr. Rabell, the respondent, who during the intestate’s life had professional relations to her affairs, was retained by such persons to act as lawyer, and he did so, not only in procuring the letters, but also generally as to some matters pertaining to administration, among other things in adjusting the transfer tax. He presented a bill deemed by the representatives so considerable that they refused to pay it, whereupon he petitioned that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. In re PierisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Unite Here Local 30 v. Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay NationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API