Legal Opinion

Troy City Bank v. . Lauman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The evidence advanced by the plaintiffs was supposed to warrant the inference that the defendants were general partners, and that their association was not confined to the transaction mentioned in their contract with the Attica and Hornellsville Railroad Company, dated on the 29th of November, 1850, and which, by its terms, was to end on the 1st of January, 1852, previous to the dates of the notes and drafts on which this action was instituted. In the articles of agreement signed by them they are described as "partners under the firm of Lauman, Rockafellow Moore." The defendants' counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. President, Directors, & Co. of the Bank of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1821
  2. Walker v. Bank of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ankeny v. Multnomah CountyMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1872
  2. Etz v. PlaceNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Niagara District Bank v. Fairman & Willard Machine Tool Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Myers v. StandartOhio Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Shuler v. GilletteNew York Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API