Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Harmon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1988No. F-85-782Published

1Concurrence

PARKS, Judge,

specially concurring:

Although I concur in the majority opinion, I write separately to more fully discuss appellant’s second assignment of error urging that the trial court erred in allowing the State to amend the information to add an after former conviction charge. Appellant correctly points out that in Price v. State, 598 P.2d 668, 669 (Okl.Cr.1979), this Court held that it is reversible error for the State to amend an information on the day of trial to add an after former conviction charge, where the defendant was not informed of such charge at the preliminary hearing. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API