Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Hopper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1975No. 129809PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Chief Justice.

Petitioner is presently confined under a five-year sentence imposed for motor vehicle theft. He did not appeal his conviction. His petition for habeas corpus relief complained solely of a portion of the convicting court’s charge to the jury that recent possession by petitioner of the goods taken "if not satisfactorily explained, raise[s] the presumption of guilt and it would authorize you to identify the defendant as the guilty party and to convict him of the crime as charged. The presumption of guilt, however, is one of evidence and not of law, and may be rebutted by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Cool v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stephens v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. Sosbee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Selph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API