Legal Opinion

Richard Hatfield Nickles v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1967No. 9113_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant was charged in a multiple count indictment for violations of §§ 371 and 1341 of Title 18 United States Code for mail fraud and conspiracy. He was tried before a jury which returned a verdict of guilty, and this appeal has been taken. The appellant urges three principal points on appeal, each of which assert that the trial court was in error in failing to direct a verdict of not guilty, and in addition one of the points relates to the refusal of the trial court to grant appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The record shows that appellant and others were engaged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Robert Charles Maguire v. United States of America, Charles Russel Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. James Henry Cartwright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Estep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. James T. McNeiveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Hubert Mason, and Charles Albert Garrett, Jr. v. United States of America, Samuel Lewis Gladney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Oliver James AmmonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Reies Lopex TijerinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. William J. ArmantroutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API