Legal Opinion
Chappelle v. Beacon Communications Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 28, 1994No. 92 Civ. 8987(DAB)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BATTS, District Judge.
Defendant Leon Ichaso (“Ichaso”) moves to dismiss the Complaint against him, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, in that he now claims that he is a domiciliary of New York, as is the plaintiff Aleta Chappelle (“Chappelle”), and not of California, as plaintiff asserted in her Complaint. 1 Plaintiff Chappelle cross-moves for sanctions, attorney’s fees and costs, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, alleging that defendant Ichaso’s counsel wilfully withheld material…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Aleta Chappelle v. Beacon Communications Corp., Beacon Films, Inc., Ghiznost Productions, Inc. And Gregory BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Leslie v. BancTec Service Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Wojcik v. 42nd Street Development Project, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- MacKason v. Diamond Financial LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Dukes v. N.Y.C. Employees' Ret. Sys.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.