Montgomery v. Dunning
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
On the accounting of the surviving administrator, objection was made that the administrator had surrendered to one Fredericks, as assets of the firm of Montgomery & Fredericks, certain gold dust which, the next of kin allege, was the individual property of the deceased.
I think the proof in the case sufficient to establish the partnership between the intestate and Fredericks. I have come to that conclusion independently of the testimony of Fredericks. It appears also, that the deceased stated on his arrival here, that he had come to Mew York for the purpose of purchasing goods…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Beste v. BurgerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
- Sheerin v. Public AdministratorNew York Surrogate's Court · 1877
- In re the Estate of HowardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- Vogel v. ArbogastNew York Surrogate's Court · 1886