Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown County v. Shannon R.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2005No. 2004AP1305, 2004AP1306Published

1DissentPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 106. (dissenting). The majority opinion overturns the termination of Shannon R.'s parental rights to Darell and Daniel, both of whom have been out of her home for more than three years. The majority bases its decision on an evidentiary ruling that prevented Shannon from obtaining one answer to one question from one person over the course of a three-day jury trial. In order to achieve a reversal, the majority converts the eviden-tiary question that was presented into a constitutional issue. Majority op., ¶¶ 65-66. It does so by constructing a rationale that was never presented to the circuit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. PulizzanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. McConnohieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API