Legal Opinion
Luce v. State Highway Commissioner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1914No. Calendar No. 26,252PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Certiorari to Branch; Knowlen, J. Mandamus by Emery G. Luce and others, as board of county road commissioners of Branch county, against Frank F. Rogers, State highway commissioner, for an order requiring respondent to entertain a petition of relators for the establishment of a State reward trunk line highway. Writ denied. Relators bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The legislature, at its session in 1913, passed Act No. 334, with this title:
“An act to provide for the establishment, survey, improvement and maintenance of State reward trunk line highways, to provide for the payment of double State reward thereon, to define the duties of State, county, good roads district and township officers in regard thereto, and to appropriate funds to carry out the provisions thereof.”
Section 1 of the act provides as follows:
“Provision is hereby made for the establishment of State reward trunk line highways. These highways which are laid out as hereinafter provided…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Chapman v. BuderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Moeller v. Wayne County Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Ford Motor Co. v. Village of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Erdelyi v. ErdelyiMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Saginaw County Township Officers Ass'n v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.