Legal Opinion

Husted v. Bostick

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 4, 1988No. 1126Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Justice:

Appellant William S. Husted sued respondent Katherine M. Bostick seeking to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered in an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict for Ms. Bostick. Mr. Husted appeals. We affirm.

The single issue presented on appeal is whether the trial judge erred “in giving a ‘special hazard’ charge to the jury based on Section 56-5-1520(c) of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976.” (Other issues raised by the exceptions of Mr. Husted were specifically abandoned in oral argument before us.)

Mr. Husted argues that reversal is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yaun v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Cornwell v. PlummerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API