Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allstate Indemnity Company v. Levina Rice

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 17, 2014No. 13-1878Published

1DissentBye, Circuit Judge

The umbrella policy Allstate Indemnity issued to the Underwoods contains an ambiguity which must be construed in Rice’s favor, and results in coverage for the Un-derwoods’ personal activity of allowing the permissive use of their vehicle by Howard Wiebe. I therefore dissent from the decision to affirm the district court.

Under the section of the umbrella policy entitled “Excess Liability Insurance Coverage XL (XL coverage),” Allstate Indemnity agreed to provide coverage for an occurrence arising out of the personal activities of an insured person, “including the permissive use of a land…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeck v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Lutsky v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc. of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Weathers v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Swan Magnetics, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API