Legal Opinion

Felch v. Weare

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case, for injuries from a defective highway. Verdict for the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtChase, J.

1. The plaintiff’s- evidence tended to show that he had suffered from hernia prior to the accident, and that it was aggravated by the injury. He made no mention of this fact in his statement, filed with the town clerk and selectmen in obedience to statutory requirements (Gf. L., c. 75, s. 7; Laws 1885, e. 65). The defendants’ counsel was allowed to comment upon this omission in his closing argument to the jury, and the jury were allowed to consider the statement while making their verdict, to both of which rulings the plaintiff excepted. The statutes required the plaintiff to embody in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bullard v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  2. Baldwin v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Story v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Lee v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  3. Fuller v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  4. Palmer v. DimickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API