Legal Opinion

(PS) Strojnik v. Wickstrom Hospitality, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 18, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02043Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PETER STROJNIK, SR., No. 2:19-cv-002043 JAM AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 WICKSTROM HOSPITALILTY, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro se and has paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The 18 action is referred to the undersigned for pretrial proceedings by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 19 302(c)(21). Defendant Wickstrom Hospitality, d/b/a Amber House Inn of Midtown (“Amber 20 House” or “Hotel”) moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in late 2019.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API