Ekeh v. Hartford Fire Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS
ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Hartford Fire Insurance Company moves this Court to conduct an in camera review of certain privileged communications between plaintiff Inno Ekeh and his attorneys.
This case has its origins in a 1994 lawsuit filed against Ekeh and the Urban Economic Development Corporation (UEDC), Ekeh’s former employer and Hartford’s insured, by Kristine Knockum, a former employee and subordinate of Ekeh’s. After Knockum sued, Ekeh was fired. He then filed a cross-complaint against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Donald E. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tei Fu CHEN; The Sunrider Corporation, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Pruyn v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Muehlbauer v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003