Legal Opinion
Rooney v. Chicago Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 14, 2001No. 01-7396PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff Paul K. Rooney, P.C. (“Rooney”), a professional legal corporation, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its complaint in which the firm alleged that defendant Chicago Insurance Company (“CIC”) breached a contract for malpractice insurance (the “policy”) that he purchased. The district court found that Rooney’s claim for counsel fees and expenses he incurred in obtaining reversal of a district court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schlaifer Nance & Company v. The Estate of Andy Warhol, Frederick Hughes, Edward W. Hayes, Esq., and Vincent FremontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Schlaifer Nance & Company, Inc. v. Estate Of Andy WarholCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Schlaifer Nance & Co. v. Estate of WarholDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- General Star Indemnity Co. v. Driven Sports, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Sirignano v. Chicago InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002