Harrison v. Orr

An important question in the case is whether there be evidence making issuable the facts determinative of the asserted bar of limitations. In the original opinion, it was said that the case would “not be restated here except to the extent necessary to illustrate the points under discussion,” and Mr. Orr’s “cross-examination” is set out “in part.” It is also shown in that opinion that in the omitted portions of his testimony there are some statements which, “if separately considered,” would “show that he acquired the information * * * at some date shortly after (maybe, before) the sale,” and,…