Legal Opinion
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1915No. 22,658PublishedCited by 11 opinions
From Hamilton Circuit Court; James M. Purvis, Special Judge. Action by Dora E. Rooker and others against the Fidelity Trust Company, which filed a counterclaim, and others. From a judgment for the Fidelity Trust Company, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Spencer, C. J.,
— On October 11, 1909, appellants,-Dora E. Rooker and William V. Rooker, as first parties, and the appellee, Fidelity Trust Com*173pany, as second party, entered into a certain trust contract and executed as evidence of such contract the following memorandum in writing, omitting the formal parts:
“Witnesseth:
“Paragraph 1. That concurrently herewith and as a part of the contract evidenced by this memorandum, the said first parties have this day by their certain written instruments in the form of a general warranty deed conveyed to second party as trustee, ever upon the conditions and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Hoffman, Burneston & Co. v. MackallOhio Supreme Court · 1855
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Schmueckle v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Zimmerman v. GaumerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Dorweiler v. SinksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.