Solowij v. Otis Elevator Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered November 9, 2000, which granted the motion of defendant Otis Elevator Co. and the cross motion of defendant Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny Otis Elevator’s motion and to reinstate the complaint as against Otis Elevator, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
While plaintiff, in response to defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, failed to raise any triable issue of fact as whether defendant Cushman &…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Burgess v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Burgess v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- DiPilato v. H. Park Central Hotel, L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kleinberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Banks v. Odd Job Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Effatt v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010