Legal Opinion

Rees v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 2009No. 08-293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM GUNTER, Justice.

| ]Appellee Sandra Smith sued appellants, alleging various torts, after appellant David Rees allegedly demanded sexual favors as a condition of his continued legal representation of her. A jury awarded appellee $10,000 for emotional distress, and appellants now raise seven arguments on appeal: the trial court erred in (1) allowing appellee to present her claim when there is no legal basis for a right of recovery for emotional distress in breach of fiduciary duty cases; (2) denying appellants’ motion for sanctions for appellee’s alleged discovery violations; (3) admitting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. McQuay v. GuntharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Croom v. YountsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Hess v. TreeceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Bailey v. Rose Care CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Dowty v. RiggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Walls v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Paulino v. QHG of Springdale, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Exigence, LLC v. BaylarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API