Legal Opinion

United States v. Crowder

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 25, 2018No. Criminal No. 2017-0186Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal No. 17-186 (JDB) AMBER R. CROWDER, also known as “AMBER HINES,” and SHAUNA MARIE BRUMFIELD, also known as “MARIE MATTHEWS,” also known as “SHAUNA SNELL,” Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is [25] the government’s motion to disqualify defendant Amber Crowder’s counsel, Gregory Lattimer. The government claims that Lattimer must be disqualified because of a “web of representations” he has allegedly spun, serving as an attorney not only for Crowder but also for defendants’ companies—A…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API