Legal Opinion
Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 20, 1968No. 43855PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Where, as in the case sub judice, the conditional sale contract named the company the defendant was representing but did not show that he signed the instrument in a representative capacity, the trial judge sitting without a jury did not err in finding the defendant personally liable. Code Ann. § 109A-3 — 403 (Ga. L. 1962, pp. 156, 257).
On condition that the part of the judgment in excess of $2,581.54 principal and $333.15 attorney’s fees be written off, the judgment is affirmed; otherwise reversed.
Judgment affirmed on condition.
Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. L. Jackson Chevrolet, Inc. v. OxleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Associated Services of Accountable Professionals, Ltd. v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Avery v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Loeb v. Schafer Bros. (In re the Austin Group, Inc.)District Court, D. Georgia · 1987