Legal Opinion

State v. Parkman

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 25, 2012No. 2010-KA-02052-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Mississippi does not allow criminal defendants to use pretrial pleadings to test the sufficiency of the evidence supporting an indictment. Yet here the trial court granted a defendant’s pretrial challenge to the evidence supporting the embezzlement count of a three-count indictment, dismissing the charge with prejudice. Because our supreme court has emphasized the proper time to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence is during trial after the State has presented its case, and not at a pretrial hearing, we have no alternative but to reverse the dismissal of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. State v. PeoplesMississippi Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BisbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. Adrian Donte Wilson v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  3. State of Mississippi v. Brandon RawlingsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API