State v. Bollenbach
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Rice county, Buckham, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and' conviction of the offense set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant was convicted in the district court »of the. county of Rice of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor in the town of Wheeling after the people of such town had voted against the issuance of license for th'e sale of intoxicating liquor therein. He was adjudged to pay a fine of $75, with the costs of prosecution, and be imprisoned in the county jail for thirty days. This is an appeal by him from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The record presents only one question for review, viz: Was there sufficient competent evidence received to sustain a finding by the jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heintzelman v. Druids' Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Commonwealth v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899