Legal Opinion
Iconic Mars Corporation v. Kaotica Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 5, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00092Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ICONIC MARS CORP., Case No.: 22-CV-0092-CAB-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON EQUITABLE CLAIMS 13 v. AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 14 KAOTICA CORP., 15 Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 123, 125 and 119] 16 17 Before the Court are the parties’ post-jury trial motions for resolution of equitable 18 claims asserted in this litigation, and Kaotica Corporation’s motion for an award of 19 attorneys’ fees and costs. [Doc. Nos. 123, 125 and 119.] Iconic Mars Corporation 20 (“Iconic”) seeks a finding of unfair competition…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sunearth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation v. Baccarat Clothing Co., Inc., a Corporation, Meier Caspi and Tchia Caspi, IndividualsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Internet Specialties West, Inc. v. Milon-Digiorgio Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.