Commonwealth v. Person
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
Where a fire marshall, while seeking to determine the extent of smoke damage caused by a recently extinguished fire, observes in plain view that which he believes to be drugs and drug paraphernalia and thereafter summons a police officer, may the police officer seize the evidence without first obtaining a search warrant? The trial court held that a search warrant was required and suppressed the evidence which had been observed by the fire marshall and seized by the police officer: The trial court also suppressed additional evidence which had been found and seized in a *199later…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. EadySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Wengert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. BowerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.