Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Person

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1989No. 1189PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Where a fire marshall, while seeking to determine the extent of smoke damage caused by a recently extinguished fire, observes in plain view that which he believes to be drugs and drug paraphernalia and thereafter summons a police officer, may the police officer seize the evidence without first obtaining a search warrant? The trial court held that a search warrant was required and suppressed the evidence which had been observed by the fire marshall and seized by the police officer: The trial court also suppressed additional evidence which had been found and seized in a *199later…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. EadySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Wengert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. State v. BowerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API