Legal Opinion

Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Kingsley

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 1, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

119 N.J. Super. 102 (1972)

290 A.2d 304

OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM KINGSLEY, ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF TAXATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 21, 1972.

Decided May 1, 1972.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, HALPERN and LORA.

Mr. Russell W. Annich, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Mason, Griffin & Moore, attorneys).

Mr. Herbert K. Glickman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pringle v. New Jersey Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. In Re Estate of LambertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bristol-Myers Co. v. Taxation Division DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  2. H.B. Acquisitions, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1991
  3. Sharps, Pixley, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  4. Lenox Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API