Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 1978No. 78-127PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

We are asked to decide whether a plaintiff, having timely filed an action which is subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution, may refile the action again after both the original action and the first refiled action have been dismissed and still be entitled to have the Statute of Limitations tolled by section 24 of the Limitations Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 83, par. 24a.

Section 24 of the Limitations Act provides in pertinent part as follows:

“In the actions specified in this Act or any other act or contract where time for commencing an action is limited, * * ° or the action is dismissed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franzese v. TrinkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Walker v. L. E. Meyers Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Reed v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cady v. HarlanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pintavalle v. ValkanosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Gendek v. JehangirIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Phillips v. ElrodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. LaBarge, Inc. v. Corn Belt BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Fanaro v. FIRST NAT'L BK. OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API