100,000 Victim Families Note Holders Owners of Securities in Towers Financial Corp. v. Schulte Roth & Zable
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
I. Background
Plaintiff Steven J. Hoffenberg (“Plaintiff’), a pro se litigant, sues Messrs. Schulte Roth & Zabel (“Defendant”), counsel to LaSalle National Bank, et al., seeking $200,000,000.00 in damages alleging, among other things, that “[Defendant] had [no] legal right to settle the Shawmut D[ & ]P lawsuit in 1997 hurting TFC [Towers Financial Corporation] stock and note holders[.]” (Amended Compl. at ¶ 71.) 1 According to Plaintiff, by helping to settle the 1993 action entitled LaSalle National Bank, et al. v. Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co. and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003