Legal Opinion

100,000 Victim Families Note Holders Owners of Securities in Towers Financial Corp. v. Schulte Roth & Zable

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 14, 2001No. 99 Civ. 6042(RMB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

BERMAN, District Judge.

I. Background

Plaintiff Steven J. Hoffenberg (“Plaintiff’), a pro se litigant, sues Messrs. Schulte Roth & Zabel (“Defendant”), counsel to LaSalle National Bank, et al., seeking $200,000,000.00 in damages alleging, among other things, that “[Defendant] had [no] legal right to settle the Shawmut D[ & ]P lawsuit in 1997 hurting TFC [Towers Financial Corporation] stock and note holders[.]” (Amended Compl. at ¶ 71.) 1 According to Plaintiff, by helping to settle the 1993 action entitled LaSalle National Bank, et al. v. Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co. and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API