Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Dowell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 17, 1980No. 35,827; CMR No. 436321/GPublished

1DissentCook, Judge

I

CAPTAIN BLACK’S OBLIGATION TO COMPLY WITH THE McOMBER RULE.

The majority’s declaration, in Part III, that Captain Black’s notification to the accused that an additional charge had been preferred against him was “the ‘functional *42equivalent’ of interrogation” and, thereby, obligated Captain Black to comply with the rule in United States v. McOmber, 1 M.J. 380 (C.M.A. 1976), impels me to immediate disagreement. The majority acknowledge that under paragraph 32i)l), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), a unit commander, like Captain Black, has the “duty to inform ...…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API