United States v. Dowell
United States Court of Military Appeals
1DissentCook, Judge
I
CAPTAIN BLACK’S OBLIGATION TO COMPLY WITH THE McOMBER RULE.
The majority’s declaration, in Part III, that Captain Black’s notification to the accused that an additional charge had been preferred against him was “the ‘functional *42equivalent’ of interrogation” and, thereby, obligated Captain Black to comply with the rule in United States v. McOmber, 1 M.J. 380 (C.M.A. 1976), impels me to immediate disagreement. The majority acknowledge that under paragraph 32i)l), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), a unit commander, like Captain Black, has the “duty to inform ...…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.