Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Kilpatrick

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 28, 2001No. 2000155Published

1Opinion of the Court

824 So.2d 788 (2001)

David COLEMAN and Renae Coleman

v.

Michael KILPATRICK and Lisa Kilpatrick.

2000155.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 28, 2001.

Charles J. Kettler, Jr., of Kettler & Kettler, Luverne, for appellants.

Michael Kilpatrick and Lisa Kilpatrick, pro se.

YATES, Presiding Judge.[1]

Michael and Lisa Kilpatrick sued David and Renae Coleman on February 8, 1999, seeking to establish the proper boundary line between the parties' adjacent properties. The Kilpatricks alleged, among other things, that the Colemans are adjacent property owners, that they share a common boundary, and that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bull v. SalsmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Apley v. TagertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Coleman v. KilpatrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API