Legal Opinion

Cate-Schweyen v. Cate

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2000No. 99-302PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 This is an appeal from an Order and Rationale entered by the Eleventh District Court, Flathead County, on December 14,1998, denying Personal Representative JoAnn Cate’s (JoAnn) motion for summary judgment and granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of Shannon Cate-Schweyen, individually, and as Conservator of Sara Cate, a minor (collectively referred to herein as Shannon). The Order provided that JoAnn would convey various assets to Shannon and take other actions with respect thereto, and also awarded Shannon her costs.

¶2 We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erker v. KesterMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Eckart v. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McCormick v. BrevigMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Matter of Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Calcaterra v. Montana ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carne v. WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Sullivan v. LamachMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Day v. SeblatniggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  4. Cate-Schweyen v. CateMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Marjorie Q. Ward Revocable TrustMontana Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API