Legal Opinion

Allen v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1871PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. Samuel Dodge. The tallow factory in question was “ two or three miles west of Galveston,” according to the statement of facts; and was directly on the line of the Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad. Many witnesses were called on each' side. Their olfactories did not agree very well.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

The indictment in this case is, in many respects, uncertain and indefinite, and to some extent obnoxious to the exceptions filed by the defendants. Yet we think there are acts charged against the defendants sufficient to constitute a misdemeanor under the statute, .according to the plain import and construction of article 2034, Paschal’s Digest, and the evident and manifest intention of the Legislature that passed the act. That article declares that if any person “ shall do any act or thing that *232would be deemed and held to be a nuisance at common law, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Brooks v. CollierCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1900
  5. Whitcomb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API