Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1969No. 68-1089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

The appellant and a co-defendant were informed against for the crime of armed robbery. Both defendants pleaded not guilty to the charges and were tried without a jury. A single public defender was appointed to represent the appellant and his co-defendant; no demand was made for separate counsel and no objection was entered as to the joint representation by a single attorney. They were both adjudicated guilty and sentenced for the crime charged. The co-defendant has prosecuted a separate appeal. See Jennings v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 117, Third District Court of Appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Crum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baxter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Kruglak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Jennings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Dupree v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API