Legal Opinion · Dissent
Butterly & Green, Inc. v. Lomenzo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 1973Published
1DissentShapiro, J.
(dis-
senting in part). Since the majority memorandum of this court does not detail the record facts, I find it necessary to delve into the record at some length, to show the basis for my partial dissent. Petitioners are Butterly & Green, Inc., a licensed real estate brokerage firm; Norman Klines, the corporation’s representative broker; Margaret Allen, also a licensed real estate broker; and Philip Goldstein and Eugene Steiner, licensed real estate salesmen, employed by Butterly & Green, Inc. They were sent a notice of hearing by respondent, directing them to answer a complaint charging…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.