Legal Opinion

State v. Spargo

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 2007No. COA06-1138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

The State has appealed from the superior court’s order dismissing 10 counts of obtaining property by false pretenses on the grounds of collateral estoppel arising out of the court’s prior dismissal of four counts of the same offense. According to the State, each of the 14 counts were based on checks signed by Beatrice Lawter — leaving the amount and payee vacant — and given to defendant Stephen Michael Spargo for payment of medical expenses of Ms. Lawter’s son. We hold that even though the trial court determined that the State had failed to prove that defendant illegally converted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Franklin v. Maynard, Director, South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. Gilliam v. Kenneth SealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. J. Gilliam v. Kenneth SealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. State v. LammCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  4. State v. SpargoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. SpargoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API