Legal Opinion

United States v. Havens

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 17, 2019No. 6:18-CR-17-REW-HAIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Wier, United States District Judge *629The narrow question before the Court is whether the First Step Act of 2018's broadening of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) (i.e. , the statutory "safety valve") applies to a defendant who pleaded guilty before the Act became law but was sentenced after that date. The answer turns on the meaning of "conviction entered" in § 402(b) of the Act. Because the Court concludes that conviction entry, in context, corresponds with pronouncement of guilt rather than date of judgment, it finds the § 402 changes inapplicable in this pre-Act plea scenario.

I

Timothy Havens…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Eulogio Ramiro Yoza TiguaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  3. United States v. Eulogio Ramiro Yoza TiguaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Freddy Oswaldo Torres CastroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Freddy Oswaldo Torres CastroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API