United States v. Havens
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Wier, United States District Judge *629The narrow question before the Court is whether the First Step Act of 2018's broadening of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) (i.e. , the statutory "safety valve") applies to a defendant who pleaded guilty before the Act became law but was sentenced after that date. The answer turns on the meaning of "conviction entered" in § 402(b) of the Act. Because the Court concludes that conviction entry, in context, corresponds with pronouncement of guilt rather than date of judgment, it finds the § 402 changes inapplicable in this pre-Act plea scenario.
I
Timothy Havens…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Eulogio Ramiro Yoza TiguaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- United States v. Eulogio Ramiro Yoza TiguaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Freddy Oswaldo Torres CastroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Freddy Oswaldo Torres CastroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020