Legal Opinion

Fegers Et Vir. v. Pompano Farms, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 27, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBupord, C.J.

—In this case bill of complaint was filed to foreclose mortgage. The right to foreclose was based upon a stipulation in the mortgage that if default occurred in the payment of interest for a period of ten days the mortgagee, its successors or assigns, should have the option to declare the entire amount of principal and interest unpaid due and payable. In this respect this case is like that of Clay vs. Girdner, in which opinion was filed in this Court on October 16, 1931.

There is no allegation in the bill of complaint that the complainant had given any notice, prior to the institution of suit,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turner v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Karter v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Denby v. MellgrewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Downs v. Hopkins, Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Williams v. NolandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. River Holding Co. v. NickelSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Boyette v. CardenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Miami Gardens, Inc. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Brooks v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Moore v. ParkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API