Legal Opinion

Carson v. Carson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1926No. 24,932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is a suit brought by plaintiff through her guardian to set aside certain transfers of real estate and personal property made to her son, defendant Delrner Carson, and for other relief. The Prudential Insurance Company which holds a mortgage on the real estate in question is named as a defendant, but was not a party to the trial and is not a party to this appeal. Its mortgage is admitted to be valid. Defendant Marie Carson is the wife of defendant Delmer and had no part in the transactions in controversy, and has no interest in the property involved except such as arises out of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruer v. BruerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Wall v. MeilkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Briggs v. BuzzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Dose v. DoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API