Smith v. Ullman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. Tlie oa.se is stated in the opinion of the Court. First Exception.—The evidence being closed, the defendant offered the two following prayers: 2. That if the jury believe from the evidence that the said sale was in its nature, an auction sale, or a sale where the goods were to he sold to the highest bidder, and that the witness, Noland, as agent for the defendant, did agree with the plaintiffs, that if the plaintiffs would…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. Tlie oa.se is stated in the opinion of the Court. First Exception.—The evidence being closed, the defendant offered the two following prayers: 2. That if the jury believe from the evidence that the said sale was in its nature, an auction sale, or a sale where the goods were to he sold to the highest bidder, and that the witness, Noland, as agent for the defendant, did agree with the plaintiffs, that if the plaintiffs would not hid for said goods, that if the said Noland, as agent for the defendant, or the defendant himself bought the goods oil…
1Opinion of the Court
Bartor, O. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a suit brought by the appellees against the appellant.
The materia] facts of the case as disclosed by the record are correctly stated in the appellees’ brief as follows:
“The appellees were dealers in old iron, doing business in Alexandria, Ya. The appellant was a dealer in the same kind of goods at Richmond, Ya. Roland the general agent of appellant for the purchase of g-oods, was in Alexandria in October 1879, and received information from the *188appellees that hids for the purchase of certain materials offered for sale by the United…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Preske v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Gainesville Oil & Gas Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Berg v. PlittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Gulick v. WebbNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.