Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Flomenhoft

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 25, 1994No. 1-92-0564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

Continental Casualty Company (Continental) brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not required to defend or indemnify Howard Flomenhoft (Flomenhoft), an attorney, for his legal malpractice in connection with his formation and representation of Morgan Associates (Morgan), a limited partnership, in which Montclair Investments (Montclair) was a limited partner. Besides Flomenhoft, the named defendants are the partners in Montclair. Continental moved for summary judgment on the grounds that (a) the policy it issued Flomenhoft did not provide coverage because his negligence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Collins v. ReynardIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Srivastava v. Russell's Barbecue, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Management Support Associates v. Union Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Mason v. Home Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Kramer v. McDonald's System, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karlov v. Home Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API