Legal Opinion

Wilken v. Moorman Manufacturing Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1931No. 27589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants have appealed from a judgment for damages in an action sounding in tort.

*2The errors complained of relate solely to the jurisdiction of the court over the persons of the defendants.

Summons was served personally on defendant Rucklos in Seward county. It is claimed that he was enticed into that county for the purpose of obtaining service of process on him in this action. The evidence shows that Rucklos was a resident of Lancaster county; that he was frequently transacting business as a salesman or sales manager in. Seward county and was in the county transacting such business on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brophy v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Porter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Kron v. J. C. Robinson Seed Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ritchie v. Illinois Central RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yoder v. Nu-Enamel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Stoehr v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1977
  4. Yoder v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Carter v. American Bus Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API