Legal Opinion

Leendertsen v. Price Waterhouse

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 20, 1996No. 36029-9-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

We are asked to address whether the trial court erred by permitting the Leendertsens to recover interest paid to the IRS as a result of an underpayment of taxes caused in part by Price Waterhouse’s negligence. PW argues that because the Leendertsens had the value of the use of the money, recovering interest paid to the IRS is inappropriate. We agree and reverse.

Clark, Nuber & Company, a prior defendant in this case, prepared plaintiffs Howard and Elizabeth Leendertsens’ tax returns for 1986 and 1987. These returns miscalculated the Leendertsens’ net operating loss carrybacks, resulting in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. David Stone and Colleen Stone v. John Wilson Kirk and J.W.K. Land and Cattle Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Alpert v. Shea Gould Climenko & CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Ciminski v. SCI CORPORATIONWashington Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ronson v. TalesnickDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  2. McCulloch v. Price Waterhouse LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. O'BRYAN v. AshlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Frank v. LockwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API