Legal Opinion

Mott v. Frost

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided July 25, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. For former report see 45 Fed. Rep. 897.

1Opinion of the CourtSimonton, J.

This libel is for freight and demurrage. There had been short delivery of cargo. Respondents retained $289.08 to meet it; Finding, however, that the vessel was not liable for this, they notified the master of their readiness to pay. The libel being subsequently filed, they, before answering, paid the sum into the registry. This will be treated as a tender. Ben. Adm. 3552. The libel claims demurrage for detention in unloading, owing to the manner of unloading cargo. It was the duty under the charter-party of the vessel to discharge the cargo. The master employed respondents as stevedores. If…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. WallaceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1868
  2. Thacher v. Boston Gas Light Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carbon Slate Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
  2. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  3. New Ruperra S. S. Co. v. 2,000 Tons of CoalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1903
  4. United States v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API