Legal Opinion

Haag v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided January 14, 2014No. Docket No. 26430-12Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

KATHLEEN HAAG, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Haag v. Comm'r

Docket No. 26430-12

United States Tax Court

2014 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 12; 107 T.C.M. (CCH) 1063;

January 14, 2014, Filed

Haag v. United States, 736 F.3d 66, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23684 (1st Cir. Mass., 2013)

An appropriate order and decision will be entered.

Timothy J. Burke, for petitioner.

Patrick F. Gallagher and Michael R. Fiore, for respondent.

NEGA, Judge.

NEGA

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEGA, Judge: Petitioner seeks this Court's review, pursuant to section 6015,1 of the denial by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Lantz v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  4. Lantz v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Haag v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API